LONDON CITY

> The UKs Information Commissioner has called for a full public debate
> about a proposed super-database that would log every phone call, text
> and email in Britain.
>
> Every phone call email and text. That is with the exception of
> communications within the public sector. Thats strange.
>
> The database, which would hold the details of every ones telephone and
> Internet communications and could be accessed by a wide range of security
> agencies, public bodys and anyone with the righ hand shake me thinks.
> Would be a a step too far for the British way of life.
>
> Unless that is that the public could in return scrutinise every telephone
> and Internet communication of every public official in an open and
> transparent way.
>
> Do we really want the police, security services and other organs of the
> state to have access to more and more aspects of our private lives?
> This proposal to introduce an extended Orwellian surveillance systems is
> well under way. And many of the more draconian ideals it implies are
> still in the discussion stage between the Home Office and the
> telecommunications and Internet industries.
>
> The Internet was born out of the freedom to be able to freely express our
> individual ideals privately and protected from intrusion of the state.
>
> This radical shake-up of surveillance over the years has give police new
> powers to monitor phone lines and Internet communication, letting them
> store details on every individuals browsing and communication traffic
> already, if they are suspected of any crime. But what this bill will do
> is make it routine and compulsory, and as a result we are all guilty
> until prov-en innocent. And if laws are added onto laws that are added
> onto them. Then in the end we will all be breakers of one law or other.
>
> But yet again no one is watching the watchers, who are in fact the law
> makers and the public official who are exempt from such intrusions and
> exempt from such laws at the excuse of national security and the moral
> high ground.
>
> There seriously needs to be some lines draw in the sand. Just so that we
> are all fully aware of where this fully loaded fright train is heading?
>
> ...and thats the truth.
>

> The UKs Information Commissioner has called for a full public debate
> about a proposed super-database that would log every phone call, text
> and email in Britain.
>
> Every phone call email and text. That is with the exception of
> communications within the public sector. Thats strange.
>
> The database, which would hold the details of every ones telephone and
> Internet communications and could be accessed by a wide range of security
> agencies, public bodys and anyone with the righ hand shake me thinks.
> Would be a a step too far for the British way of life.
>
> Unless that is that the public could in return scrutinise every telephone
> and Internet communication of every public official in an open and
> transparent way.
>
> Do we really want the police, security services and other organs of the
> state to have access to more and more aspects of our private lives?
> This proposal to introduce an extended Orwellian surveillance systems is
> well under way. And many of the more draconian ideals it implies are
> still in the discussion stage between the Home Office and the
> telecommunications and Internet industries.
>
> The Internet was born out of the freedom to be able to freely express our
> individual ideals privately and protected from intrusion of the state.
>
> This radical shake-up of surveillance over the years has give police new
> powers to monitor phone lines and Internet communication, letting them
> store details on every individuals browsing and communication traffic
> already, if they are suspected of any crime. But what this bill will do
> is make it routine and compulsory, and as a result we are all guilty
> until prov-en innocent. And if laws are added onto laws that are added
> onto them. Then in the end we will all be breakers of one law or other.
>
> But yet again no one is watching the watchers, who are in fact the law
> makers and the public official who are exempt from such intrusions and
> exempt from such laws at the excuse of national security and the moral
> high ground.
>
> There seriously needs to be some lines draw in the sand. Just so that we
> are all fully aware of where this fully loaded fright train is heading?
>
> ...and thats the truth.
>

> The UKs Information Commissioner has called for a full public debate
> about a proposed super-database that would log every phone call, text
> and email in Britain.
>
> Every phone call email and text. That is with the exception of
> communications within the public sector. Thats strange.
>
> The database, which would hold the details of every ones telephone and
> Internet communications and could be accessed by a wide range of security
> agencies, public bodys and anyone with the righ hand shake me thinks.
> Would be a a step too far for the British way of life.
>
> Unless that is that the public could in return scrutinise every telephone
> and Internet communication of every public official in an open and
> transparent way.
>
> Do we really want the police, security services and other organs of the
> state to have access to more and more aspects of our private lives?
> This proposal to introduce an extended Orwellian surveillance systems is
> well under way. And many of the more draconian ideals it implies are
> still in the discussion stage between the Home Office and the
> telecommunications and Internet industries.
>
> The Internet was born out of the freedom to be able to freely express our
> individual ideals privately and protected from intrusion of the state.
>
> This radical shake-up of surveillance over the years has give police new
> powers to monitor phone lines and Internet communication, letting them
> store details on every individuals browsing and communication traffic
> already, if they are suspected of any crime. But what this bill will do
> is make it routine and compulsory, and as a result we are all guilty
> until prov-en innocent. And if laws are added onto laws that are added
> onto them. Then in the end we will all be breakers of one law or other.
>
> But yet again no one is watching the watchers, who are in fact the law
> makers and the public official who are exempt from such intrusions and
> exempt from such laws at the excuse of national security and the moral
> high ground.
>
> There seriously needs to be some lines draw in the sand. Just so that we
> are all fully aware of where this fully loaded fright train is heading?
>
> ...and thats the truth.
>

> The UKs Information Commissioner has called for a full public debate
> about a proposed super-database that would log every phone call, text
> and email in Britain.
>
> Every phone call email and text. That is with the exception of
> communications within the public sector. Thats strange.
>
> The database, which would hold the details of every ones telephone and
> Internet communications and could be accessed by a wide range of security
> agencies, public bodys and anyone with the righ hand shake me thinks.
> Would be a a step too far for the British way of life.
>
> Unless that is that the public could in return scrutinise every telephone
> and Internet communication of every public official in an open and
> transparent way.
>
> Do we really want the police, security services and other organs of the
> state to have access to more and more aspects of our private lives?
> This proposal to introduce an extended Orwellian surveillance systems is
> well under way. And many of the more draconian ideals it implies are
> still in the discussion stage between the Home Office and the
> telecommunications and Internet industries.
>
> The Internet was born out of the freedom to be able to freely express our
> individual ideals privately and protected from intrusion of the state.
>
> This radical shake-up of surveillance over the years has give police new
> powers to monitor phone lines and Internet communication, letting them
> store details on every individuals browsing and communication traffic
> already, if they are suspected of any crime. But what this bill will do
> is make it routine and compulsory, and as a result we are all guilty
> until prov-en innocent. And if laws are added onto laws that are added
> onto them. Then in the end we will all be breakers of one law or other.
>
> But yet again no one is watching the watchers, who are in fact the law
> makers and the public official who are exempt from such intrusions and
> exempt from such laws at the excuse of national security and the moral
> high ground.
>
> There seriously needs to be some lines draw in the sand. Just so that we
> are all fully aware of where this fully loaded fright train is heading?
>
> ...and thats the truth.
>

> The UKs Information Commissioner has called for a full public debate
> about a proposed super-database that would log every phone call, text
> and email in Britain.
>
> Every phone call email and text. That is with the exception of
> communications within the public sector. Thats strange.
>
> The database, which would hold the details of every ones telephone and
> Internet communications and could be accessed by a wide range of security
> agencies, public bodys and anyone with the righ hand shake me thinks.
> Would be a a step too far for the British way of life.
>
> Unless that is that the public could in return scrutinise every telephone
> and Internet communication of every public official in an open and
> transparent way.
>
> Do we really want the police, security services and other organs of the
> state to have access to more and more aspects of our private lives?
> This proposal to introduce an extended Orwellian surveillance systems is
> well under way. And many of the more draconian ideals it implies are
> still in the discussion stage between the Home Office and the
> telecommunications and Internet industries.
>
> The Internet was born out of the freedom to be able to freely express our
> individual ideals privately and protected from intrusion of the state.
>
> This radical shake-up of surveillance over the years has give police new
> powers to monitor phone lines and Internet communication, letting them
> store details on every individuals browsing and communication traffic
> already, if they are suspected of any crime. But what this bill will do
> is make it routine and compulsory, and as a result we are all guilty
> until prov-en innocent. And if laws are added onto laws that are added
> onto them. Then in the end we will all be breakers of one law or other.
>
> But yet again no one is watching the watchers, who are in fact the law
> makers and the public official who are exempt from such intrusions and
> exempt from such laws at the excuse of national security and the moral
> high ground.
>
> There seriously needs to be some lines draw in the sand. Just so that we
> are all fully aware of where this fully loaded fright train is heading?
>
> ...and thats the truth.
>

> The UKs Information Commissioner has called for a full public debate
> about a proposed super-database that would log every phone call, text
> and email in Britain.
>
> Every phone call email and text. That is with the exception of
> communications within the public sector. Thats strange.
>
> The database, which would hold the details of every ones telephone and
> Internet communications and could be accessed by a wide range of security
> agencies, public bodys and anyone with the righ hand shake me thinks.
> Would be a a step too far for the British way of life.
>
> Unless that is that the public could in return scrutinise every telephone
> and Internet communication of every public official in an open and
> transparent way.
>
> Do we really want the police, security services and other organs of the
> state to have access to more and more aspects of our private lives?
> This proposal to introduce an extended Orwellian surveillance systems is
> well under way. And many of the more draconian ideals it implies are
> still in the discussion stage between the Home Office and the
> telecommunications and Internet industries.
>
> The Internet was born out of the freedom to be able to freely express our
> individual ideals privately and protected from intrusion of the state.
>
> This radical shake-up of surveillance over the years has give police new
> powers to monitor phone lines and Internet communication, letting them
> store details on every individuals browsing and communication traffic
> already, if they are suspected of any crime. But what this bill will do
> is make it routine and compulsory, and as a result we are all guilty
> until prov-en innocent. And if laws are added onto laws that are added
> onto them. Then in the end we will all be breakers of one law or other.
>
> But yet again no one is watching the watchers, who are in fact the law
> makers and the public official who are exempt from such intrusions and
> exempt from such laws at the excuse of national security and the moral
> high ground.
>
> There seriously needs to be some lines draw in the sand. Just so that we
> are all fully aware of where this fully loaded fright train is heading?
>
> ...and thats the truth.
>